What? BTC and ETH are still at high levels, and isn't October 11th considered a 312-level black swan?
It can be said with certainty that BTC, ETH, and future assets like SOL with ETF channels have already been classified as "U.S. stock assets."
These types of assets have evolved from being "speculative targets" for retail investors to "institutional allocation assets." The scale of funds and allocation logic from Wall Street, listed companies, and ETFs are no longer what they used to be.
But look at the real altcoin market, where ATOM, IOTX, SOLV, DYDX, and others have plummeted by over 90% or even gone to zero. Really, this level of devastation is even more brutal than the original 312, if not worse.
The overall environment has completely changed, and even the way "black swans" appear has changed. So how should we proceed on the path to "rising again"?
I just finished chatting with a few bigwigs in the circle, and everyone is discussing the same thing...
The theory of "a four-year cycle" is completely outdated!
If you are still holding on to getting rich, and you are still fantasizing about "a tenfold and hundredfold chance of lying down and winning in a bull market", you may have been completely abandoned by the market. Why?
Because Smart Money has long discovered a secret: Crypto is no longer suitable for one set of plays, but 4 completely different play cycles are running 🧵 at the same time:
The rhythm, gameplay, and money-making logic of each gameplay cycle are completely different.
- Bitcoin Super Cycle: Retail investors are out, and a decade of slow bulls may be a foregone conclusion
The "playbook" of the traditional halving cycle? It's completely ineffective! BTC has evolved from a "speculation target" to an "institutional allocation of assets", and the capital volume and allocation logic of Wall Street, listed companies, and ETFs are not at all the "bull and bear switching" gameplay of retail investors.
What are the key changes? Retail chips are being handed over on a large scale, while institutional funds represented by MicroStrategy are frantically entering the market. This fundamental restructuring of the chip structure is redefining the price discovery mechanism and volatility characteristics of BTC.
What are retail investors facing? The double squeeze of "time cost" and "opportunity cost". Institutions can afford a 3-5 year holding period to wait for BTC's long-term value to be realized, but what about retail investors? Obviously, it is impossible to have this kind of patience and financial strength.
In my opinion, we are likely to see a BTC super slow bull that lasts for more than a decade. The annualized yield is stable in the 20-30% range, but the intraday volatility is significantly reduced, and it is more like a solid growth technology stock. As for what the price cap of BTC will be? From the perspective of retail investors now, it is even difficult to predict.
- MEME Attention Short-Wave Cycle: From Slum Paradise to Professional Leek Cutting Field
In fact, the MEME long bull theory is also true, in the window period of technical narrative expression, MEME narrative will always cooperate with the beat of emotion, money and attention to fill the "boring vacuum" of the market.
What is the essence of MEME? It is the speculative vehicle of "instant gratification". No white paper, no technical validation, no roadmap, just a symbol that makes people smile or resonate. From cat and dog culture to political meme, from AI concept packaging to community IP incubation, MEME has evolved into a complete set of "emotional monetization" industry chain.
Sadly, the "short, flat and fast" nature of MEME makes it a barometer of market sentiment and a reservoir of funds. When funds are abundant, MEME becomes the preferred testing ground for hot money; When money is scarce, MEME becomes the last speculative haven.
However, the reality is cruel, and the MEME market is evolving from a "grassroots carnival" to a "professional competition". The difficulty for the average retail investor to profit from this high-frequency rotation is increasing exponentially.
There may be fewer and fewer stories of P teenagers sitting and casting legends, and the entry of studios, scientists, and big households will make this former "slum paradise" involuted.
——The long cycle of technological narrative leap forward: the valley of death bottoms out, starting 10 times in 3 years?
The technical narrative is gone? Inexistent. Innovations with real technical thresholds, such as Layer 2 scaling, ZK technology, AI infra, etc., require 2-3 years or even longer to build before seeing actual results. Such projects follow the Gartner Hype Cycle, rather than the capital markets' sentiment cycle – there is a fundamental time dislocation between the two.
The reason why the technology narrative is criticized by the market is that it is overvalued when the project is still in the concept stage, and then undervalued in the "valley of death" when the technology really starts to land. This determines that the value release of technology projects presents a non-linear leap forward characteristic.
For investors with patience and technical judgment, deploying truly valuable technology projects in the "valley of death" stage may be the best strategy to achieve alpha. But only if you can live with long waiting periods and market grinding, as well as potential cynicism.
——Short cycle of innovation small hot spots: 1-3 months window period, brewing the main rising wave narrative
Before the formation of the main technical narrative, various small narratives rotate rapidly, from RWA to DePIN, from AI Agent to AI Infra (MCP+A2A), and each small hot spot may only have a window period of 1-3 months.
This narrative fragmentation and high-frequency rotation reflect the dual constraints of the current market attention scarcity and capital rent-seeking efficiency.
In fact, it is not difficult to find that the typical mini-narrative cycle follows a six-stage model: "proof-of-concept→ capital exploration→ public opinion amplification→ FOMO entry→ valuation overdraft→ capital withdrawal". Want to profit in this model?
The key is to enter from the "proof of concept" to the "funding tentative" stage and exit at the peak of the "FOMO entry".
The competition between small narratives is essentially a zero-sum game of attention resources. But there is a technical relevance and conceptual progression between narratives. For example, the Model Context Protocol (MCP) protocol and the Agent-to-Agent (A2A) interaction standard in AI Infra are actually the underlying technical reconstruction of the AI Agent narrative. If the follow-up narrative can continue the former hot spots, form a systematic upgrade linkage, and truly precipitate a sustainable value closed loop in the linkage process. It is likely that a mega-narrative with a major upswing level similar to DeFi Summer will be born.
Judging from the existing small narrative pattern, the AI infrastructure level is the most likely to take the lead in achieving a breakthrough. If the underlying technologies such as MCP protocol, A2A communication standard, distributed computing power, inference, and data network can be organically integrated, they do have the potential to build a super narrative similar to "AI Summer".
Above.
In general, it is important to recognize the essence of these four parallel play cycles in order to find the right strategy in their respective rhythms. Needless to say, a single "four-year cycle" mentality is completely unable to keep up with the complexity of the current market.
Adapting to the new normal of "multiple play cycles in parallel" may be the key to real profits in this bull market.

32.84K
2
The content on this page is provided by third parties. Unless otherwise stated, OKX is not the author of the cited article(s) and does not claim any copyright in the materials. The content is provided for informational purposes only and does not represent the views of OKX. It is not intended to be an endorsement of any kind and should not be considered investment advice or a solicitation to buy or sell digital assets. To the extent generative AI is utilized to provide summaries or other information, such AI generated content may be inaccurate or inconsistent. Please read the linked article for more details and information. OKX is not responsible for content hosted on third party sites. Digital asset holdings, including stablecoins and NFTs, involve a high degree of risk and can fluctuate greatly. You should carefully consider whether trading or holding digital assets is suitable for you in light of your financial condition.